<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended limitation for reassessment fails where escaped income does not meet the statutory threshold and notice is based on incorrect material.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98515</link>
    <description>For reopening beyond three years, the statutory threshold under section 149(1)(b) must be met by material showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakhs or more. The Tribunal held that the reopening was initiated on incorrect or non-existing portal information, because the assessment ultimately treated only Rs. 17,17,597 as unexplained after verification and explanation by the assessee. As the case did not satisfy the extended-limitation condition, it fell within section 149(1)(a) and the notice under section 148 issued beyond three years was invalid. The consequential reassessment order under section 147 read with section 144B was quashed as void ab initio.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended limitation for reassessment fails where escaped income does not meet the statutory threshold and notice is based on incorrect material.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98515</link>
      <description>For reopening beyond three years, the statutory threshold under section 149(1)(b) must be met by material showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakhs or more. The Tribunal held that the reopening was initiated on incorrect or non-existing portal information, because the assessment ultimately treated only Rs. 17,17,597 as unexplained after verification and explanation by the assessee. As the case did not satisfy the extended-limitation condition, it fell within section 149(1)(a) and the notice under section 148 issued beyond three years was invalid. The consequential reassessment order under section 147 read with section 144B was quashed as void ab initio.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:48:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>