<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1793 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467845</link>
    <description>Legal heirs of a deceased shareholder may maintain an oppression and mismanagement petition where the deceased&#039;s rights in the shares have devolved on them, even if their names have not yet been entered in the register of members. Requiring prior registration of transmission under the Companies Act, 2013 would be unduly technical and would defeat the remedy&#039;s purpose. The decisive consideration is devolution of the shareholder&#039;s rights to the legal representatives, not the pendency of formal transmission. A challenge to locus on the ground of absence of membership therefore cannot succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1793 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467845</link>
      <description>Legal heirs of a deceased shareholder may maintain an oppression and mismanagement petition where the deceased&#039;s rights in the shares have devolved on them, even if their names have not yet been entered in the register of members. Requiring prior registration of transmission under the Companies Act, 2013 would be unduly technical and would defeat the remedy&#039;s purpose. The decisive consideration is devolution of the shareholder&#039;s rights to the legal representatives, not the pendency of formal transmission. A challenge to locus on the ground of absence of membership therefore cannot succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>