https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467846 Interlocutory orders passed during the pendency of a company petition cannot be independently challenged after the petition has been finally dismissed, where the final judgment is already under appeal. The NCLAT applied the principle of merger, holding that interim applications and their orders lose separate existence once the main proceeding is finally adjudicated, especially where they are of lesser significance than the final decision. On that basis, separate appeals against the interim orders were held not maintainable, and no useful purpose would be served by examining them on merits. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:07:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467846 Interlocutory orders passed during the pendency of a company petition cannot be independently challenged after the petition has been finally dismissed, where the final judgment is already under appeal. The NCLAT applied the principle of merger, holding that interim applications and their orders lose separate existence once the main proceeding is finally adjudicated, especially where they are of lesser significance than the final decision. On that basis, separate appeals against the interim orders were held not maintainable, and no useful purpose would be served by examining them on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467846