<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1997 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467853</link>
    <description>Section 153A additions for unabated assessment years cannot be sustained unless they are based on incriminating material seized during the search and relatable to the relevant years. Here, the assessment years were already completed on the date of search, and the disallowance of losses and estimated profit addition were not shown to arise from any specific seized material. As the statutory precondition for disturbing completed assessments was not met, the additions were quashed and the assesments could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1997 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467853</link>
      <description>Section 153A additions for unabated assessment years cannot be sustained unless they are based on incriminating material seized during the search and relatable to the relevant years. Here, the assessment years were already completed on the date of search, and the disallowance of losses and estimated profit addition were not shown to arise from any specific seized material. As the statutory precondition for disturbing completed assessments was not met, the additions were quashed and the assesments could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>