https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467833 A minority institution established and administered by the Jain community falls within Article 30(1), and on that basis the governing rules did not require prior approval before terminating a teacher's service. A prior Division Bench ruling recognising the institution's minority status was binding on the Single Judge, so a contrary view could not be sustained. State authorities also could not treat the same institution inconsistently after accepting that status. The termination was therefore legally valid. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2026 11:57:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467833 A minority institution established and administered by the Jain community falls within Article 30(1), and on that basis the governing rules did not require prior approval before terminating a teacher's service. A prior Division Bench ruling recognising the institution's minority status was binding on the Single Judge, so a contrary view could not be sustained. State authorities also could not treat the same institution inconsistently after accepting that status. The termination was therefore legally valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467833