<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 291 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789222</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit remained available for consultancy and allied services used to set up and expand a plant after 01.04.2011 because the post-amendment definition of &quot;input service&quot; still covered services used directly or indirectly, or in relation to manufacture. Setting up a factory was treated as an activity intrinsically connected with manufacture, since production cannot begin without such setup, and the deletion of the express reference to &quot;setting up&quot; did not remove such services from the main limb of Rule 2(l) unless specifically excluded. On that basis, the credit was held admissible and the related demand, interest, and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 291 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789222</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit remained available for consultancy and allied services used to set up and expand a plant after 01.04.2011 because the post-amendment definition of &quot;input service&quot; still covered services used directly or indirectly, or in relation to manufacture. Setting up a factory was treated as an activity intrinsically connected with manufacture, since production cannot begin without such setup, and the deletion of the express reference to &quot;setting up&quot; did not remove such services from the main limb of Rule 2(l) unless specifically excluded. On that basis, the credit was held admissible and the related demand, interest, and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>