https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789242 Sections 95 to 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code create a pre-adjudicatory process in which the resolution professional's role under Section 99 is facilitative and recommendatory, with no final determination of rights until the adjudicating authority acts under Section 100. An order appointing a resolution professional and directing submission of a report at that stage does not finally decide any controversy, does not itself deprive a party of a legally protected right, and is therefore not treated as an appealable merits determination. The interim-moratorium does not expand the right of appeal. The appeal was held premature and not maintainable at the Section 99 stage. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789242 Sections 95 to 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code create a pre-adjudicatory process in which the resolution professional's role under Section 99 is facilitative and recommendatory, with no final determination of rights until the adjudicating authority acts under Section 100. An order appointing a resolution professional and directing submission of a report at that stage does not finally decide any controversy, does not itself deprive a party of a legally protected right, and is therefore not treated as an appealable merits determination. The interim-moratorium does not expand the right of appeal. The appeal was held premature and not maintainable at the Section 99 stage. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789242