<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 331 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789262</link>
    <description>Commission paid to a promoter full-time director was held not allowable as business expenditure because the assessee did not show any extraordinary effort beyond the director&#039;s normal duties. The payment was linked to turnover, but the director was already remunerated for the same functional role in marketing and business development, and no distinct service or independent business justification supported a separate commission. Board and shareholder approval did not cure the defect where the expenditure was found excessive and unsupported by a direct nexus to business necessity, so the disallowance was restored in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 331 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789262</link>
      <description>Commission paid to a promoter full-time director was held not allowable as business expenditure because the assessee did not show any extraordinary effort beyond the director&#039;s normal duties. The payment was linked to turnover, but the director was already remunerated for the same functional role in marketing and business development, and no distinct service or independent business justification supported a separate commission. Board and shareholder approval did not cure the defect where the expenditure was found excessive and unsupported by a direct nexus to business necessity, so the disallowance was restored in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>