<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789276</link>
    <description>Limited scrutiny cannot be widened into complete scrutiny without the prescribed written approval, and the wider enquiry was therefore treated as unauthorised. Earlier share-acquisition transactions could still be examined in the relevant year where they formed the basis of the capital gains claim, despite those prior years being time-barred. Deduction under section 54F was not to be denied merely because the residential property was not registered, since substantive investment, supporting agreement, possession-related material, and payment evidence can satisfy the purchase requirement. On the stated conclusions, the assessment order was held unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789276</link>
      <description>Limited scrutiny cannot be widened into complete scrutiny without the prescribed written approval, and the wider enquiry was therefore treated as unauthorised. Earlier share-acquisition transactions could still be examined in the relevant year where they formed the basis of the capital gains claim, despite those prior years being time-barred. Deduction under section 54F was not to be denied merely because the residential property was not registered, since substantive investment, supporting agreement, possession-related material, and payment evidence can satisfy the purchase requirement. On the stated conclusions, the assessment order was held unsustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>