<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 364 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789295</link>
    <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed as infructuous because a subsequent appellate order had already revoked the cancellation of GST registration. The Court kept open the question of law on interpretation of limitation under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, so that issue was not decided. The impugned High Court judgment was directed not to be treated as a precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 364 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789295</link>
      <description>The Special Leave Petition was dismissed as infructuous because a subsequent appellate order had already revoked the cancellation of GST registration. The Court kept open the question of law on interpretation of limitation under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, so that issue was not decided. The impugned High Court judgment was directed not to be treated as a precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>