<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 365 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789296</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere in the Special Leave Petition and disposed of the matter, while clarifying that the petitioner may pursue its statutory appellate remedy. The Court further stated that the remedy should be considered without reference to delay in approaching the Tribunal, and it expressed no opinion on the merits of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 365 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789296</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere in the Special Leave Petition and disposed of the matter, while clarifying that the petitioner may pursue its statutory appellate remedy. The Court further stated that the remedy should be considered without reference to delay in approaching the Tribunal, and it expressed no opinion on the merits of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>