<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DTAA treaty-rate limits on dividend tax and benchmarking of management fees were remanded for fresh examination.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98491</link>
    <description>Dividend distribution tax on payments to a non-resident shareholder was examined against the India-Netherlands DTAA, with the Tribunal noting that treaty rate restriction may apply and that the matter required verification of the applicable treaty and domestic rate comparison; the issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after due examination. Transfer pricing adjustment on management fees was also sent back for fresh consideration because the assessee&#039;s cost-benefit material and the benchmarking approach, including aggregation, had not been fully examined; the Dispute Resolution Panel was directed to reconsider the issue with adequate opportunity to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DTAA treaty-rate limits on dividend tax and benchmarking of management fees were remanded for fresh examination.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98491</link>
      <description>Dividend distribution tax on payments to a non-resident shareholder was examined against the India-Netherlands DTAA, with the Tribunal noting that treaty rate restriction may apply and that the matter required verification of the applicable treaty and domestic rate comparison; the issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after due examination. Transfer pricing adjustment on management fees was also sent back for fresh consideration because the assessee&#039;s cost-benefit material and the benchmarking approach, including aggregation, had not been fully examined; the Dispute Resolution Panel was directed to reconsider the issue with adequate opportunity to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>