<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 223 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51035</link>
    <description>An amount demanded under Rule 57CC for reversal of credit linked to exempted clearances was treated as neither excise duty nor Modvat credit. On that basis, the ordinary recovery machinery under the Central Excise Act did not apply, because the statute and rules did not provide a specific mechanism to assess or recover such an amount. The impugned demand was therefore held not legally recoverable, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 223 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51035</link>
      <description>An amount demanded under Rule 57CC for reversal of credit linked to exempted clearances was treated as neither excise duty nor Modvat credit. On that basis, the ordinary recovery machinery under the Central Excise Act did not apply, because the statute and rules did not provide a specific mechanism to assess or recover such an amount. The impugned demand was therefore held not legally recoverable, and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>