https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467820 Where attached office units had already been returned after settlement of the civil dispute and the criminal case had been closed, continued attachment could not be justified and was set aside. The Tribunal also held that cash, documents and digital devices seized from the appellants could not be retained once the related proceedings had ended in closure and no surviving predicate offence remained on the recorded facts. On that basis, the impugned attachment, seizure and retention orders were interfered with and the connected appeals were allowed. en-us Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Apr 2026 15:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467820 Where attached office units had already been returned after settlement of the civil dispute and the criminal case had been closed, continued attachment could not be justified and was set aside. The Tribunal also held that cash, documents and digital devices seized from the appellants could not be retained once the related proceedings had ended in closure and no surviving predicate offence remained on the recorded facts. On that basis, the impugned attachment, seizure and retention orders were interfered with and the connected appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467820