<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1619 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467823</link>
    <description>Tariff classification turned on whether processing altered the essential character of betel nut and cardamom. Menthol scented supari retained the character of dried areca nut despite drying, de-husking, boiling, cutting, roasting, flavouring and packing, so the specific entry for areca nuts prevailed over Chapter 21 food preparations. Flavoured and coated illaichi similarly remained cardamom; coating and flavouring were treated as minor additions that did not displace its identity as a spice, and Chapter 21 was inapplicable because it excludes spices covered by headings 0904 to 0910. The specific tariff items were therefore preferred over the residuary food-preparation heading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 15:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1619 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467823</link>
      <description>Tariff classification turned on whether processing altered the essential character of betel nut and cardamom. Menthol scented supari retained the character of dried areca nut despite drying, de-husking, boiling, cutting, roasting, flavouring and packing, so the specific entry for areca nuts prevailed over Chapter 21 food preparations. Flavoured and coated illaichi similarly remained cardamom; coating and flavouring were treated as minor additions that did not displace its identity as a spice, and Chapter 21 was inapplicable because it excludes spices covered by headings 0904 to 0910. The specific tariff items were therefore preferred over the residuary food-preparation heading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>