<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Job work and manufacture distinction: crushing limestone/dolomite was treated as service, not manufacture, under GST.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98452</link>
    <description>A registered recipient may seek an advance ruling where the transaction affects its tax position, because the term &quot;applicant&quot; is broad enough to cover such a request; the locus objection was therefore rejected and the ruling was examined on merits. On classification, crushing, screening and sizing of limestone/dolomite did not amount to manufacture because the processes did not produce a new product with a distinct name, character and use; the mineral identity and commercial understanding remained unchanged, with only physical dimensions altered. The contractor&#039;s assumption of operational risk was irrelevant. The activity was treated as treatment or processing of another person&#039;s goods and therefore a supply of service in the nature of job work.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:58:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Job work and manufacture distinction: crushing limestone/dolomite was treated as service, not manufacture, under GST.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98452</link>
      <description>A registered recipient may seek an advance ruling where the transaction affects its tax position, because the term &quot;applicant&quot; is broad enough to cover such a request; the locus objection was therefore rejected and the ruling was examined on merits. On classification, crushing, screening and sizing of limestone/dolomite did not amount to manufacture because the processes did not produce a new product with a distinct name, character and use; the mineral identity and commercial understanding remained unchanged, with only physical dimensions altered. The contractor&#039;s assumption of operational risk was irrelevant. The activity was treated as treatment or processing of another person&#039;s goods and therefore a supply of service in the nature of job work.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:58:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>