<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing consistency supports use of BAPA margin for non-US AE transactions where FAR profile is unchanged.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98444</link>
    <description>Where transfer pricing analysis was applied uniformly to all international transactions and no separate benchmarking was carried out for non-US based AE transactions, the Tribunal treated the BAPA margin as a reliable persuasive benchmark. It noted that the Revenue failed to show any material difference in the FAR profile of the non-US transactions from those covered by the BAPA. Applying the principle of consistency, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s claim and directed adoption of the BAPA margin for determining the arm&#039;s length price of the non-US based AE transactions as well. The appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:55:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing consistency supports use of BAPA margin for non-US AE transactions where FAR profile is unchanged.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98444</link>
      <description>Where transfer pricing analysis was applied uniformly to all international transactions and no separate benchmarking was carried out for non-US based AE transactions, the Tribunal treated the BAPA margin as a reliable persuasive benchmark. It noted that the Revenue failed to show any material difference in the FAR profile of the non-US transactions from those covered by the BAPA. Applying the principle of consistency, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s claim and directed adoption of the BAPA margin for determining the arm&#039;s length price of the non-US based AE transactions as well. The appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:55:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>