<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rectification cannot be used as review: Tribunal power under Section 420 is limited to patent errors on record.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98435</link>
    <description>Section 420 of the Companies Act confers only a limited power on the Tribunal to rectify a mistake apparent from the record within the prescribed period; it does not give a party a right to seek review or reconsideration on merits. An application styled as rectification but directed at recalling disclosure, attachment and restraint directions was treated as a review petition in substance and held not maintainable. The Appellate Tribunal relied on the principle that an error requiring reappraisal or a different view on merits is not a patent mistake capable of rectification. The refusal to recall the earlier order was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:28:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rectification cannot be used as review: Tribunal power under Section 420 is limited to patent errors on record.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98435</link>
      <description>Section 420 of the Companies Act confers only a limited power on the Tribunal to rectify a mistake apparent from the record within the prescribed period; it does not give a party a right to seek review or reconsideration on merits. An application styled as rectification but directed at recalling disclosure, attachment and restraint directions was treated as a review petition in substance and held not maintainable. The Appellate Tribunal relied on the principle that an error requiring reappraisal or a different view on merits is not a patent mistake capable of rectification. The refusal to recall the earlier order was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:28:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>