<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Nil/Low TDS Certificates Rejection not possible due to existing demand only ITA&#039;61... Under ITA&#039;25 situation may ease a little due to additional disclosure requirements in Form 128</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16139</link>
    <description>Section 197 permits nil or lower TDS certificates to prevent excessive withholding where the taxpayer&#039;s likely liability is lower than the rate otherwise deductible. Rule 28AA requires a holistic assessment of estimated income, past tax history, existing demand and its enforceability, and refunds due, so the decision is not made mechanically. A rejection based solely on outstanding demand is not a proper exercise of discretion where the order does not address the taxpayer&#039;s submissions or the enforceable character of the demand. The revised regime is described as adding disclosure safeguards through Form 128.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:58:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Nil/Low TDS Certificates Rejection not possible due to existing demand only ITA&#039;61... Under ITA&#039;25 situation may ease a little due to additional disclosure requirements in Form 128</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16139</link>
      <description>Section 197 permits nil or lower TDS certificates to prevent excessive withholding where the taxpayer&#039;s likely liability is lower than the rate otherwise deductible. Rule 28AA requires a holistic assessment of estimated income, past tax history, existing demand and its enforceability, and refunds due, so the decision is not made mechanically. A rejection based solely on outstanding demand is not a proper exercise of discretion where the order does not address the taxpayer&#039;s submissions or the enforceable character of the demand. The revised regime is described as adding disclosure safeguards through Form 128.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:58:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>