<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 218 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789149</link>
    <description>Service-tax notices under Section 73(1) must be issued within thirty months from the relevant date, unless the extended five-year period is validly attracted by fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement or intentional contravention; on the stated facts, a notice issued beyond that period was treated as time-barred and without jurisdiction. The High Court also reiterated that a writ petition may be entertained despite an alternative statutory appeal where the proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction, and that service tax cannot be demanded again on receipts already subjected to VAT. The impugned adjudication was therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 218 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789149</link>
      <description>Service-tax notices under Section 73(1) must be issued within thirty months from the relevant date, unless the extended five-year period is validly attracted by fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement or intentional contravention; on the stated facts, a notice issued beyond that period was treated as time-barred and without jurisdiction. The High Court also reiterated that a writ petition may be entertained despite an alternative statutory appeal where the proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction, and that service tax cannot be demanded again on receipts already subjected to VAT. The impugned adjudication was therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>