<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 222 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789153</link>
    <description>The liquidation framework under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires claims to be lodged within the time fixed in the public announcement, and a stale claim filed after an inordinate delay cannot be revived without a satisfactory explanation. A customs department claim lodged 787 days late was rejected because the delay was unexplained, and the pendency of related customs proceedings or the claimant&#039;s status as a authority did not justify bypassing the liquidation timeline. The regulations were applied to preserve the speed and finality of liquidation, and the rejection of the belated claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=895006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 222 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789153</link>
      <description>The liquidation framework under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires claims to be lodged within the time fixed in the public announcement, and a stale claim filed after an inordinate delay cannot be revived without a satisfactory explanation. A customs department claim lodged 787 days late was rejected because the delay was unexplained, and the pendency of related customs proceedings or the claimant&#039;s status as a authority did not justify bypassing the liquidation timeline. The regulations were applied to preserve the speed and finality of liquidation, and the rejection of the belated claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>