https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789161 For Article 226 territorial jurisdiction, the mere fact that part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, or that the respondent-authority and impugned order were located there, was not decisive. The Court held that jurisdiction depends on the substance of the lis and the material, essential and integral facts giving rise to the dispute. Where the underlying events and operative injury were substantially outside Delhi, the writ petition could be declined on the ground of forum conveniens. The petitioner was relegated to the appropriate jurisdictional High Court, and the Delhi writ petition was not entertained. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:53:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789161 For Article 226 territorial jurisdiction, the mere fact that part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, or that the respondent-authority and impugned order were located there, was not decisive. The Court held that jurisdiction depends on the substance of the lis and the material, essential and integral facts giving rise to the dispute. Where the underlying events and operative injury were substantially outside Delhi, the writ petition could be declined on the ground of forum conveniens. The petitioner was relegated to the appropriate jurisdictional High Court, and the Delhi writ petition was not entertained. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789161