<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789174</link>
    <description>Unsecured loans supported by confirmations, bank statements, income-tax returns, financials, PAN, MCA details and repayment records satisfied the assessee&#039;s initial burden under section 68 by establishing the lenders&#039; identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transactions. The loans were routed through banking channels and the lenders&#039; accounts showed no cash deposits before disbursement. As the Assessing Officer produced no cogent material to rebut this evidence or show accommodation entries or lack of capacity, the burden was not discharged by the Revenue. The addition under section 68 was therefore not sustainable and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:53:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789174</link>
      <description>Unsecured loans supported by confirmations, bank statements, income-tax returns, financials, PAN, MCA details and repayment records satisfied the assessee&#039;s initial burden under section 68 by establishing the lenders&#039; identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transactions. The loans were routed through banking channels and the lenders&#039; accounts showed no cash deposits before disbursement. As the Assessing Officer produced no cogent material to rebut this evidence or show accommodation entries or lack of capacity, the burden was not discharged by the Revenue. The addition under section 68 was therefore not sustainable and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>