<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51015</link>
    <description>Puffed wheat was treated as a roasted or puffed cereal falling under Chapter Heading 19.04 and was held outside the exemption under Notification No. 12/90-C.E. Puffed soya nuts were treated as an edible preparation under Chapter 21, including sub-heading 2108.99 from 23-7-1996, and were likewise denied exemption. The declaration describing the goods in exemption language rather than their true commercial identity was treated as suppression and misdeclaration, so the extended period of demand was held invocable. Limited consequential relief was granted on recomputation of duty on cum-duty value, SSI examination, penalty reconsideration, and partial confiscation issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:53:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 179 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51015</link>
      <description>Puffed wheat was treated as a roasted or puffed cereal falling under Chapter Heading 19.04 and was held outside the exemption under Notification No. 12/90-C.E. Puffed soya nuts were treated as an edible preparation under Chapter 21, including sub-heading 2108.99 from 23-7-1996, and were likewise denied exemption. The declaration describing the goods in exemption language rather than their true commercial identity was treated as suppression and misdeclaration, so the extended period of demand was held invocable. Limited consequential relief was granted on recomputation of duty on cum-duty value, SSI examination, penalty reconsideration, and partial confiscation issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>