<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1994 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467809</link>
    <description>A captive software development service provider on a cost-plus, low-risk model cannot be benchmarked against companies with materially different functions, product orientation, entrepreneurial risk, or unreliable segmental data; accordingly, Infosys Limited, Persistent Systems Limited, Tata Elxsi Limited, e-Infochips Private Limited, Wipro Limited, Nihilent Technologies Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited were excluded as comparables. Outstanding foreign-currency receivables from associated enterprises were treated as an international transaction requiring transfer pricing benchmarking, and the appropriate benchmark was held to be LIBOR-linked rather than a domestic rupee rate, with a 60-day credit period considered reasonable. The receivables adjustment was revised on that basis, granting partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1994 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467809</link>
      <description>A captive software development service provider on a cost-plus, low-risk model cannot be benchmarked against companies with materially different functions, product orientation, entrepreneurial risk, or unreliable segmental data; accordingly, Infosys Limited, Persistent Systems Limited, Tata Elxsi Limited, e-Infochips Private Limited, Wipro Limited, Nihilent Technologies Limited and Infobeans Technologies Limited were excluded as comparables. Outstanding foreign-currency receivables from associated enterprises were treated as an international transaction requiring transfer pricing benchmarking, and the appropriate benchmark was held to be LIBOR-linked rather than a domestic rupee rate, with a 60-day credit period considered reasonable. The receivables adjustment was revised on that basis, granting partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>