<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1588 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467813</link>
    <description>An addition for alleged on-money payment towards property purchase could not be sustained where it was based only on third-party material, a statement not furnished for effective rebuttal, and a general admission by the developer. In the absence of direct or independently verified corroborative evidence linking the assessee to any undisclosed cash payment, the material was insufficient to establish unexplained investment. The addition was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1588 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467813</link>
      <description>An addition for alleged on-money payment towards property purchase could not be sustained where it was based only on third-party material, a statement not furnished for effective rebuttal, and a general admission by the developer. In the absence of direct or independently verified corroborative evidence linking the assessee to any undisclosed cash payment, the material was insufficient to establish unexplained investment. The addition was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>