<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1622 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467792</link>
    <description>An addition for unexplained investment cannot be sustained on the basis of an unsigned excel sheet recovered from a third party&#039;s premises unless corroborative material links the assessee to the alleged transaction. Here, the assessee denied any property purchase or financial dealing with the developer, and the Revenue failed to identify a booked unit, cheque payment, or other supporting evidence establishing nexus with the entries. The fact that the relevant unit was purchased by another entity further weakened the Revenue&#039;s case. On these facts, the document alone was insufficient to justify addition under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 12:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1622 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467792</link>
      <description>An addition for unexplained investment cannot be sustained on the basis of an unsigned excel sheet recovered from a third party&#039;s premises unless corroborative material links the assessee to the alleged transaction. Here, the assessee denied any property purchase or financial dealing with the developer, and the Revenue failed to identify a booked unit, cheque payment, or other supporting evidence establishing nexus with the entries. The fact that the relevant unit was purchased by another entity further weakened the Revenue&#039;s case. On these facts, the document alone was insufficient to justify addition under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>