<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 246 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the benefit of Notification No. 59/90. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of earlier judgments in similar cases, clarified that the item in question was eligible for the notification, and interpreted the term &quot;building&quot; to include structures like railway bridges. The Tribunal also found that time-barred demands and penalties were not applicable due to the appellants&#039; compliance with statutory requirements. Ultimately, the Tribunal granted relief to the appellants based on the correct application of the notification and relevant precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:19:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 246 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to deny the benefit of Notification No. 59/90. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of earlier judgments in similar cases, clarified that the item in question was eligible for the notification, and interpreted the term &quot;building&quot; to include structures like railway bridges. The Tribunal also found that time-barred demands and penalties were not applicable due to the appellants&#039; compliance with statutory requirements. Ultimately, the Tribunal granted relief to the appellants based on the correct application of the notification and relevant precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>