<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SC: Pre-Deposit Cannot Be Weaponised Against a Taxpayer Denied Fair Adjudication</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16131</link>
    <description>Assessment proceedings under the U.P. GST Act were challenged on the basis that relied-upon documents were uploaded on an inaccessible portal section, preventing an effective reply and making the assessment orders ex parte in nature. The article also discusses the mandatory 10% pre-deposit under Section 107(6)(b) for filing an appeal, the taxpayer&#039;s plea of financial incapacity, and the Allahabad High Court&#039;s view that successive writ petitions seeking exemption were barred by constructive res judicata and the Henderson principle. The Supreme Court&#039;s interim order granted temporary protection against coercive recovery on a reduced deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:51:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SC: Pre-Deposit Cannot Be Weaponised Against a Taxpayer Denied Fair Adjudication</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16131</link>
      <description>Assessment proceedings under the U.P. GST Act were challenged on the basis that relied-upon documents were uploaded on an inaccessible portal section, preventing an effective reply and making the assessment orders ex parte in nature. The article also discusses the mandatory 10% pre-deposit under Section 107(6)(b) for filing an appeal, the taxpayer&#039;s plea of financial incapacity, and the Allahabad High Court&#039;s view that successive writ petitions seeking exemption were barred by constructive res judicata and the Henderson principle. The Supreme Court&#039;s interim order granted temporary protection against coercive recovery on a reduced deposit.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:51:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>