https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789086 Service tax demand, interest and penalties for the post-18.04.2006 period were sustained under the extended period of limitation, and the writ challenge was not entertained because the earlier common order had left the parties to be governed by the Supreme Court outcome and had preserved the proceedings. The plea based on delayed intimation of transfer to the call book was rejected. The High Court declined interference in writ jurisdiction, noting that an effective statutory appellate remedy remained available, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue that appeal. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789086 Service tax demand, interest and penalties for the post-18.04.2006 period were sustained under the extended period of limitation, and the writ challenge was not entertained because the earlier common order had left the parties to be governed by the Supreme Court outcome and had preserved the proceedings. The plea based on delayed intimation of transfer to the call book was rejected. The High Court declined interference in writ jurisdiction, noting that an effective statutory appellate remedy remained available, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue that appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789086