https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789091 In Section 9 insolvency proceedings, the adjudicating authority may examine the commercial arrangements, termination terms, acknowledgments and communications on record to determine whether debt and default are established; such scrutiny is not a civil trial and does not exceed summary jurisdiction. A pre-existing dispute must be real, substantiated and shown to have existed before the demand notice. On the material described, the subsequent agreement, part payment and email assurances indicated admitted liability, while the alleged damage to returned stock lacked contemporaneous support. The stated material therefore did not establish a genuine prior dispute, and admission of the Section 9 application was not shown to be barred on that ground. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789091 In Section 9 insolvency proceedings, the adjudicating authority may examine the commercial arrangements, termination terms, acknowledgments and communications on record to determine whether debt and default are established; such scrutiny is not a civil trial and does not exceed summary jurisdiction. A pre-existing dispute must be real, substantiated and shown to have existed before the demand notice. On the material described, the subsequent agreement, part payment and email assurances indicated admitted liability, while the alleged damage to returned stock lacked contemporaneous support. The stated material therefore did not establish a genuine prior dispute, and admission of the Section 9 application was not shown to be barred on that ground. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789091