<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 162 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789093</link>
    <description>An application challenging an order for lack of proper hearing is to be treated as a recall application, not a review on merits, where the record does not show a valid ex parte course or completed arguments. In insolvency and company proceedings, Section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the applicable NCLT Rules and natural justice, requires fair opportunity and proper procedural compliance. Failure to deal separately with an application for taking additional documents on record may indicate procedural defect and non-application of mind. The impugned order was found unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 162 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789093</link>
      <description>An application challenging an order for lack of proper hearing is to be treated as a recall application, not a review on merits, where the record does not show a valid ex parte course or completed arguments. In insolvency and company proceedings, Section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the applicable NCLT Rules and natural justice, requires fair opportunity and proper procedural compliance. Failure to deal separately with an application for taking additional documents on record may indicate procedural defect and non-application of mind. The impugned order was found unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>