https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789095 A tribunal cannot, while disposing of an interlocutory application as withdrawn, travel beyond the pleadings or the prayer and make unsolicited observations that affect settled rights or create a fresh route to dispute. Here, the withdrawn application was confined to dismissal as withdrawn, so remarks suggesting recourse under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013 were held to be beyond scope and amounted to judicial overreach. Those extraneous observations were quashed, while the remainder of the order was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789095 A tribunal cannot, while disposing of an interlocutory application as withdrawn, travel beyond the pleadings or the prayer and make unsolicited observations that affect settled rights or create a fresh route to dispute. Here, the withdrawn application was confined to dismissal as withdrawn, so remarks suggesting recourse under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013 were held to be beyond scope and amounted to judicial overreach. Those extraneous observations were quashed, while the remainder of the order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789095