<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 170 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789101</link>
    <description>Approval for reassessment under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must show application of mind and recorded satisfaction, even if brief; a bare endorsement such as &quot;Approved&quot; is a mechanical, non-speaking exercise and does not satisfy the statutory safeguard. Because the sanction did not disclose any consideration of the matter, it was invalid and the reassessment foundation failed, resulting in relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 170 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789101</link>
      <description>Approval for reassessment under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must show application of mind and recorded satisfaction, even if brief; a bare endorsement such as &quot;Approved&quot; is a mechanical, non-speaking exercise and does not satisfy the statutory safeguard. Because the sanction did not disclose any consideration of the matter, it was invalid and the reassessment foundation failed, resulting in relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>