<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 182 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789113</link>
    <description>Depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation was held allowable because the goodwill remained part of the same block of intangible assets and fell within business or commercial rights of a similar nature; the disallowance was deleted. The reassessment notice under section 148 was held time-barred because the original transition-period notice operated as a deemed notice under section 148A(b) and the later notice was issued beyond the surviving limitation period; the reassessment was quashed. A section 14A read with Rule 8D disallowance was deleted because no dissatisfaction was recorded against the assessee&#039;s own disallowance. The assessment made in the name of a non-existent entity was held void for want of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 182 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789113</link>
      <description>Depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation was held allowable because the goodwill remained part of the same block of intangible assets and fell within business or commercial rights of a similar nature; the disallowance was deleted. The reassessment notice under section 148 was held time-barred because the original transition-period notice operated as a deemed notice under section 148A(b) and the later notice was issued beyond the surviving limitation period; the reassessment was quashed. A section 14A read with Rule 8D disallowance was deleted because no dissatisfaction was recorded against the assessee&#039;s own disallowance. The assessment made in the name of a non-existent entity was held void for want of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>