<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 196 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789127</link>
    <description>A time-bound assessment under section 153(1) of the Income-tax Act is made only when the competent authority signs the operative document, because signature marks the point at which the authority no longer retains locus poenitentiae. The Bombay HC treated the assessment order, computation sheet and notice of demand as invalid where they were dated within time but digitally signed after the statutory limitation had expired. Applying the statutory requirement that issued documents be signed and the principle that an order is not complete until signature, the Court held that late-signature documents could not be regarded as made within time and quashed them as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 196 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789127</link>
      <description>A time-bound assessment under section 153(1) of the Income-tax Act is made only when the competent authority signs the operative document, because signature marks the point at which the authority no longer retains locus poenitentiae. The Bombay HC treated the assessment order, computation sheet and notice of demand as invalid where they were dated within time but digitally signed after the statutory limitation had expired. Applying the statutory requirement that issued documents be signed and the principle that an order is not complete until signature, the Court held that late-signature documents could not be regarded as made within time and quashed them as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>