<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 199 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789130</link>
    <description>Receipts from a global online learning platform&#039;s course and degree services were examined for taxability as fees for technical services under Section 9(1)(vii) and fees for included services under Article 12 of the Indo-US DTAA, with the core issue being whether the services satisfied the &quot;make available&quot; requirement. The ITAT&#039;s view, as upheld by the High Court, was that the services did not contain any element of included services and were therefore not taxable as FIS under the treaty. The Supreme Court declined to interfere in Special Leave Petition proceedings, noting that the finding rested on factual assessment of the services rendered and was not shown to be perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 199 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789130</link>
      <description>Receipts from a global online learning platform&#039;s course and degree services were examined for taxability as fees for technical services under Section 9(1)(vii) and fees for included services under Article 12 of the Indo-US DTAA, with the core issue being whether the services satisfied the &quot;make available&quot; requirement. The ITAT&#039;s view, as upheld by the High Court, was that the services did not contain any element of included services and were therefore not taxable as FIS under the treaty. The Supreme Court declined to interfere in Special Leave Petition proceedings, noting that the finding rested on factual assessment of the services rendered and was not shown to be perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>