<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 206 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789137</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was confirmed for petitioners facing summons under the CGST investigation framework, as the interim protection already granted had been complied with. The Court made the pre-arrest relief absolute without expressing any opinion on the merits of the underlying tax investigation, and kept the protection subject to the statutory conditions governing anticipatory bail. The decision leaves the allegations of tax evasion untouched and concerns only the continuation of pre-arrest protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 206 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789137</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was confirmed for petitioners facing summons under the CGST investigation framework, as the interim protection already granted had been complied with. The Court made the pre-arrest relief absolute without expressing any opinion on the merits of the underlying tax investigation, and kept the protection subject to the statutory conditions governing anticipatory bail. The decision leaves the allegations of tax evasion untouched and concerns only the continuation of pre-arrest protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>