<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1726 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467776</link>
    <description>Separate leave and licence agreements executed by individual co-owners meant that each received rent only for his or her own share, so the receipts could not be clubbed by treating the co-owners as an association of persons for service tax purposes. Mere joint ownership did not by itself create an association of persons in law. Because each co-owner was separately identifiable as a service provider and each individual receipt fell below the small service provider exemption threshold, the exemption notifications applied separately to each co-owner. The demand based on aggregation of all co-owners&#039; rent was therefore unsustainable, and the service tax demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 20:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1726 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467776</link>
      <description>Separate leave and licence agreements executed by individual co-owners meant that each received rent only for his or her own share, so the receipts could not be clubbed by treating the co-owners as an association of persons for service tax purposes. Mere joint ownership did not by itself create an association of persons in law. Because each co-owner was separately identifiable as a service provider and each individual receipt fell below the small service provider exemption threshold, the exemption notifications applied separately to each co-owner. The demand based on aggregation of all co-owners&#039; rent was therefore unsustainable, and the service tax demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>