<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 160 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50989</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal allegations require reliable independent corroboration beyond private notebooks and a retracted statement, such as evidence of raw-material procurement, power use, labour, customer-wise removals, or sale proceeds. Duty liability for alleged clearance of dutiable goods as exempt goods requires evidence displacing invoices, bank realisations, and assessed returns. Undervaluation through a marketing agent requires proof of mutuality of interest or related-person status. Clubbing of unit clearances for SSI exemption requires cogent material showing sham fragmentation, rather than independent operations without financial flow-back.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 160 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50989</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal allegations require reliable independent corroboration beyond private notebooks and a retracted statement, such as evidence of raw-material procurement, power use, labour, customer-wise removals, or sale proceeds. Duty liability for alleged clearance of dutiable goods as exempt goods requires evidence displacing invoices, bank realisations, and assessed returns. Undervaluation through a marketing agent requires proof of mutuality of interest or related-person status. Clubbing of unit clearances for SSI exemption requires cogent material showing sham fragmentation, rather than independent operations without financial flow-back.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>