<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 199 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50988</link>
    <description>Rectification power confined to clerical or accidental errors cannot be used to substitute the substantive basis or the person against whom a penalty is imposed, so a corrigendum doing so is unsustainable. Import under an actual user condition may attract customs consequences when the condition is breached, but any valuation enhancement must rest on proper contemporaneous evidence and full consideration of the documents relied upon by the importer. Confiscation may be maintained on the existing record, yet the penalty quantum cannot stand where correct valuation has not been freshly determined; the matter must be reconsidered on a fuller evidentiary record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:40:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 199 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50988</link>
      <description>Rectification power confined to clerical or accidental errors cannot be used to substitute the substantive basis or the person against whom a penalty is imposed, so a corrigendum doing so is unsustainable. Import under an actual user condition may attract customs consequences when the condition is breached, but any valuation enhancement must rest on proper contemporaneous evidence and full consideration of the documents relied upon by the importer. Confiscation may be maintained on the existing record, yet the penalty quantum cannot stand where correct valuation has not been freshly determined; the matter must be reconsidered on a fuller evidentiary record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>