https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50986 Fabrics sent for processing under Rule 57F(3) remained subject to the supplier's duty responsibility, and Notification No. 214/86-C.E. did not shift liability to the job worker. The Tribunal accepted that the goods were sent by the supplier for processing and were to be received back after job work, so the duty payable under law continued to rest with the supplier. It found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals) order and rejected the Revenue's contention that the job worker had to pay additional duty of excise. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:35:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50986 Fabrics sent for processing under Rule 57F(3) remained subject to the supplier's duty responsibility, and Notification No. 214/86-C.E. did not shift liability to the job worker. The Tribunal accepted that the goods were sent by the supplier for processing and were to be received back after job work, so the duty payable under law continued to rest with the supplier. It found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals) order and rejected the Revenue's contention that the job worker had to pay additional duty of excise. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50986