<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 220 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50983</link>
    <description>Transaction value under customs valuation cannot be rejected unless the Department adduces cogent evidence showing that the declared price is not genuine. Third-party papers and recorded statements, without contemporaneous import evidence of similar goods at higher prices, were held insufficient to displace the declared value. The burden of proving falsity on a preponderance of probability was not discharged, so enhancement of assessable value was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 220 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50983</link>
      <description>Transaction value under customs valuation cannot be rejected unless the Department adduces cogent evidence showing that the declared price is not genuine. Third-party papers and recorded statements, without contemporaneous import evidence of similar goods at higher prices, were held insufficient to displace the declared value. The burden of proving falsity on a preponderance of probability was not discharged, so enhancement of assessable value was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>