<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1847 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467772</link>
    <description>A Magistrate&#039;s later order that clarified an individual had not been validly arrayed as an accused was treated as a rectification of an administrative mistake in issuing summons, not a recall or review of a judicial summoning order. The document also states that a criminal complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be amended to add new accused after filing and summons, because such enlargement materially changes the complaint and is not a curable defect. Revisional interference adverse to proposed accused also required notice and an opportunity of hearing. The revisional and consequential magistrate orders enabling addition of new accused were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1847 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467772</link>
      <description>A Magistrate&#039;s later order that clarified an individual had not been validly arrayed as an accused was treated as a rectification of an administrative mistake in issuing summons, not a recall or review of a judicial summoning order. The document also states that a criminal complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be amended to add new accused after filing and summons, because such enlargement materially changes the complaint and is not a curable defect. Revisional interference adverse to proposed accused also required notice and an opportunity of hearing. The revisional and consequential magistrate orders enabling addition of new accused were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>