https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467772 A magistrate's clarification order was treated as a correction of an administrative error in the process fee, because the director had not in fact been summoned as an accused and the original summoning order against the company was left untouched. The text further states that a criminal complaint cannot ordinarily be amended after filing and issuance of process to add new accused, since the Criminal Procedure Code contains no general mechanism for such substitution and the addition is not a mere formal correction. It also notes that revisional proceedings cannot impose adverse orders on persons without notice and an opportunity of hearing. en-us Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:52:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467772 A magistrate's clarification order was treated as a correction of an administrative error in the process fee, because the director had not in fact been summoned as an accused and the original summoning order against the company was left untouched. The text further states that a criminal complaint cannot ordinarily be amended after filing and issuance of process to add new accused, since the Criminal Procedure Code contains no general mechanism for such substitution and the addition is not a mere formal correction. It also notes that revisional proceedings cannot impose adverse orders on persons without notice and an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467772