<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1914 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467771</link>
    <description>A cheque is presumed to have been issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 139 when the drawer admits issuance and produces no rebuttal evidence; that presumption remained unrebutted here, so liability was established. Statutory notice of dishonour sent by registered post to the correct address and not returned carries a presumption of service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act; the challenge to notice therefore failed. Closure of the drawer&#039;s account after issuance of the cheque does not take the matter outside Section 138, so dishonour on that ground still attracts liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1914 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467771</link>
      <description>A cheque is presumed to have been issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 139 when the drawer admits issuance and produces no rebuttal evidence; that presumption remained unrebutted here, so liability was established. Statutory notice of dishonour sent by registered post to the correct address and not returned carries a presumption of service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act; the challenge to notice therefore failed. Closure of the drawer&#039;s account after issuance of the cheque does not take the matter outside Section 138, so dishonour on that ground still attracts liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>