https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467770 A summoning order in a complaint under Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 was quashed because the complaint relied on annexures such as the annual return and inspection report, yet none of those supporting documents were filed or marked before the trial court. Without the documents forming the factual basis of the allegations, the order could not be sustained. The court also found that use of a preformatted pro forma order with blank spaces mechanically filled indicated a non-speaking exercise and lack of application of mind. The proceeding therefore ended in favour of the petitioner. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:30:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467770 A summoning order in a complaint under Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 was quashed because the complaint relied on annexures such as the annual return and inspection report, yet none of those supporting documents were filed or marked before the trial court. Without the documents forming the factual basis of the allegations, the order could not be sustained. The court also found that use of a preformatted pro forma order with blank spaces mechanically filled indicated a non-speaking exercise and lack of application of mind. The proceeding therefore ended in favour of the petitioner. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467770