<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 212 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50981</link>
    <description>Exported instant food products were held to retain the essential character of gram flour despite the addition of sodium chloride and benzoic acid in very small quantities. The private laboratory sample report was given little evidentiary value because it was not shown to have been drawn by that laboratory. On the material available, the added ingredients did not change the nature of the goods, so they remained gram flour and fell within the EXIM Policy 1992-93 AM negative list.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 212 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50981</link>
      <description>Exported instant food products were held to retain the essential character of gram flour despite the addition of sodium chloride and benzoic acid in very small quantities. The private laboratory sample report was given little evidentiary value because it was not shown to have been drawn by that laboratory. On the material available, the added ingredients did not change the nature of the goods, so they remained gram flour and fell within the EXIM Policy 1992-93 AM negative list.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>