<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 62 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788993</link>
    <description>Event management services were held to cover arranging and organising events where the assessee acted in that capacity. For valuation under Section 67, only the gross amount charged for the service was taxable, so the commission retained by the assessee, not amounts merely routed to third-party providers, formed the assessable value. Demands based on loose papers, computer printouts and unsupported statements were held unsustainable without corroboration and proved authenticity, and the extended limitation period and penalties fell with the unproven main demand. The separate Cenvat credit demand survived because it was not properly pressed or substantiated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 62 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788993</link>
      <description>Event management services were held to cover arranging and organising events where the assessee acted in that capacity. For valuation under Section 67, only the gross amount charged for the service was taxable, so the commission retained by the assessee, not amounts merely routed to third-party providers, formed the assessable value. Demands based on loose papers, computer printouts and unsupported statements were held unsustainable without corroboration and proved authenticity, and the extended limitation period and penalties fell with the unproven main demand. The separate Cenvat credit demand survived because it was not properly pressed or substantiated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>