<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788997</link>
    <description>Service tax demand could not be sustained where the adjudicating authority confirmed liability under Works Contract Service after the show cause notice proposed a different taxable category, because a demand must stay within the charge set out in the notice and cannot be enlarged in violation of natural justice. The exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST for services in relation to a historical monument was also held applicable to construction and allied works at Coronation Park, including parking and other public utility structures, as the site was treated as a historical monument and the works were not commercial in nature. The revenue challenge failed and the assessee obtained full relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 66 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788997</link>
      <description>Service tax demand could not be sustained where the adjudicating authority confirmed liability under Works Contract Service after the show cause notice proposed a different taxable category, because a demand must stay within the charge set out in the notice and cannot be enlarged in violation of natural justice. The exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST for services in relation to a historical monument was also held applicable to construction and allied works at Coronation Park, including parking and other public utility structures, as the site was treated as a historical monument and the works were not commercial in nature. The revenue challenge failed and the assessee obtained full relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>