https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789008 The direction requiring the Resolution Professional to ensure full access to the premises was unsustainable because possession and access had already attained finality under the earlier order, which had also been affirmed by dismissal of the appeal against it. The same question could not be re-agitated in subsequent proceedings, so that part of the order was set aside. However, any separate grievance by third parties claiming access to conduct business from the premises was left open to be pursued before the Adjudicating Authority in appropriate proceedings. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789008 The direction requiring the Resolution Professional to ensure full access to the premises was unsustainable because possession and access had already attained finality under the earlier order, which had also been affirmed by dismissal of the appeal against it. The same question could not be re-agitated in subsequent proceedings, so that part of the order was set aside. However, any separate grievance by third parties claiming access to conduct business from the premises was left open to be pursued before the Adjudicating Authority in appropriate proceedings. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789008